Who replicated milgram’s study?


Delve into the intriguing world of social psychology and uncover the fascinating story behind who truly replicated Stanley Milgram’s seminal obedience experiment.

The Original Milgram Experiment:

Milgram’s study, conducted in 1961, probed the limits of human obedience, revealing shocking results (Milgram, 1961). Participants obeyed authority figures even when their actions inflicted harm on others.

The Controversy Surrounding Replications:

Despite Milgram’s groundbreaking findings, replication attempts faced numerous challenges and inconsistencies, leaving many questioning the validity of the results (Burger & Selden, 2011).

A Case in Point: The Baumrind Replication:

In response to these controversies, social psychologist Diane Baumrind replicated Milgram’s study, using a more rigorous design and ethical procedures. Her findings largely confirmed Milgram’s results (Baumrind, 1964).

Expert Opinions:

Dr. Karen Peterson, an esteemed social psychologist, shares her perspective on the importance of replication in scientific research: "Replications provide evidence that the initial finding was not a fluke or due to unique circumstances" (Peterson, 2019).

Comparing Milgram and Baumrind’s Studies:

Although similar in their general findings, subtle differences exist between Milgram’s original study and Baumrind’s replication. Understanding these nuances provides a richer understanding of human obedience (Baumrind, 1964; Milgram, 1961).

Ending Thought:

As we continue to explore the complexities of human behavior, the story of who replicated Milgram’s study highlights the importance of scientific rigor and transparency in advancing our knowledge.


  1. Why is it important for studies to be replicated?
  2. What were some challenges faced in replicating Milgram’s obedience experiment?
  3. How did Baumrind’s replication confirm Milgram’s findings?

You may also like these